Damor v. Pardow
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Austin v. American Surety Co. of New York (Cal. Ct. App. 1931)
- Wolf v. Brakebill (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)
- Eppinger v. Kendrick (Cal. 1896)
- California National Bank v. Ginty (Cal. 1895)
- Southern California National Bank of Los Angeles v. Wyatt (Cal. 1891)
- Chafoin v. Rich (Cal. 1888)
- Smith v. Freyler (Mont. 1882)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The note in suit is the joint and several note of the makers. As between them and the payee they are both principals. If one of the makers received all the consideration, or if one be surety for the other as between themselves, it is a matter about which the payee is not concerned. As to him they are both principals notwithstanding, and hence if the relationship suggested exists between them it cannot be made the subject of judicial inquiry in this action.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.