Vlautin v. Bumpus

California Supreme Court
Vlautin v. Bumpus, 35 Cal. 214 (Cal. 1868)
Sawyer

Vlautin v. Bumpus

Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, C. J. :

The appeal is from the judgment in an action on a promissory note, without any statement. It does not appear when the payment on the note, admitted and allowed, was made, and it is, therefore, impossible to tell from the judgment roll whether the judgment is for too large a sum or not.

The only other point made, is, that the common property of husband and wife is not liable for the sole debt of the wife, created before her marriage. But it is otherwise settled in Van Maren v. Johnson, 15 Cal. 308.

Judgment affirmed, and the remittitur directed to issue forthwith.

Reference

Full Case Name
PAOLO VLAUTIN v. DOLORES BUMPUS, PELEG BUMPUS, and JESUS GANBOA
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Common Property Liable for Wife’s Sole Debt.—In an action against the husband and wife, on a sole debt of the wife, contracted by her before marriage, a judgment may be rendered to be collected out of the common property of both husband and wife.