Vlautin v. Bumpus
California Supreme Court
Vlautin v. Bumpus, 35 Cal. 214 (Cal. 1868)
Sawyer
Vlautin v. Bumpus
Opinion of the Court
The appeal is from the judgment in an action on a promissory note, without any statement. It does not appear when the payment on the note, admitted and allowed, was made, and it is, therefore, impossible to tell from the judgment roll whether the judgment is for too large a sum or not.
The only other point made, is, that the common property of husband and wife is not liable for the sole debt of the wife, created before her marriage. But it is otherwise settled in Van Maren v. Johnson, 15 Cal. 308.
Judgment affirmed, and the remittitur directed to issue forthwith.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PAOLO VLAUTIN v. DOLORES BUMPUS, PELEG BUMPUS, and JESUS GANBOA
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Common Property Liable for Wife’s Sole Debt.—In an action against the husband and wife, on a sole debt of the wife, contracted by her before marriage, a judgment may be rendered to be collected out of the common property of both husband and wife.