Merritt v. Glidden
Merritt v. Glidden
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court :
The complaint is sufficient. It accords substantially with the. forms given in Chittv on Pleading; and, according to the authorities cited by the plaintiff, it would be regarded as sufficient at common law. Should it be considered defective, under the rules of the Code, the defect is in matter of form and not of substance—not in the matter alleged, but in the manner in which it is alleged. Such defect can be reached only by demurrer, on the seventh ground mentioned in Section 40—that the complaint is unintelligible or uncertain.
After the cause was submitted to this Court, on briefs to be filed, the counsel for the defendants, who are the appellants, filed in this Court an adjudication of the bankruptcy of the defendants, rendered by the Register of the District Court of the United States for the District of California, after the appeal was taken. The purpose is, to have the proceedings in this Court stayed, until the question of the defendant’s discharge shall be determined.
The Bankrupt Act (14 U. S. Statutes, p. 526, Sec. 21), provides that “no creditor whose debt is provable under this Act, shall be allowed to prosecute to final judgment, any suit at law, or in equity therefor, against the bankrupt, until the question of the debtor’s discharge shall have been determined; and any such suit or proceeding, shall, upon the application of the bankrupt, be stayed to await the determination of the Court in Bankruptcy, on the question of the discharge, provided there be no unreasonable delay on the part of the bankrupt, in endeavoring to obtain his discharge. ”
" No authorities are'cited by counsel, which throw'any light on the question, whether an adjudication of the bankruptcy of a party, against whom a' judgment had been rendered, would' have the effect to stay proceedings on an appeal, which had been taken by him from the judgment.
' The judgment- from which the appeal is taken is, in our
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- S. H. MERRITT v. A. K. P. GLIDDEN
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Pbactice.—Defective Complaint..—When a complaint is defective in form, but not in substance, such defect can only be reached by demurrer, on the ground that the complaint js unintelligible or uncertain. Adjudication of Bankruptcy.—Effect on Pending Appeal.—The filing in the appellate Court of an adjudication of the bankruptcy of the defendant, rendered by the Register of the United States District Court, after the appeal is taken, will not have the effect to stay the proceedings on the appeal. United States Bankrupt Act.—Einal Judgment.—A judgment of the Court below, from which an appeal is pending, is a final judgment, in contemplation of Section 21 of the United States Bankrupt Act,