Bell v. Knowles
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Newhouse v. Upchurch (Cal. Ct. App. 1971)
- Walsh v. Erwin (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California 1902)
- King v. Bender (9th Cir. 1902)
- Cushing v. Pires (Cal. 1899)
- Kofoed v. Gordon (Cal. 1898)
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Thornton (Ala. 1897)
- Aulbach v. Dahler (Idaho 1896)
- North Star Boot & Shoe Co. v. Stebbins (S.D. 1893)
- Yik Hon v. Spring Valley Water Works (Cal. 1884)
- Atherton v. Fowler (Cal. 1873)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. The objection to the admissibility of certain evidence, now made here for the first time, cannot prevail. Had it been made and insisted upon at the trial, which it was not,
2. Upon the issues determined by the judgment the evidence is of such a character that we will not disturb the judgment.
3. There is nothing in the point as to the rate of interest named in the judgment. '
Judgment and order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.