Anderson v. Rider
Anderson v. Rider
Opinion of the Court
The point made by the defendant, that the judgment, order of sale, and Sheriff’s deed under which the plaintiff deraigns title, are void, because it appears by the judgment that several city lots were assessed in solido, and not each separately, cannot be maintained. The precise point was decided, and we think correctly, in Mayo v. Foley, 40 Cal. 282. Nor was the Sheriff’s deed void because the purchase money was not paid until several months after the sale. There was no proof that there was any stipulation for credit
Judgment affirmed, except as to the damages, and cause remanded, with an order to the Court below to modify its judgment in accordance with this opinion.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- W. S. M. ANDERSON v. JOHN RIDER
- Cited By
- 14 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Sheriff’s Deed for Taxes. — A Sheriff’s deed made under a sale for a tax, in pursuance of a judgment enforcing the lien of the tax, is not void because the property sold, being several lots in a city, was assessed in sólido, and not each lot separately. Idem.—Such deed is not void because the purchase money at the tax sale was not paid to the Sheriff until some time after the sale, provided the Sheriff accepted of it. Deed fob -Latest Tax the Best.—A title acquired by a Sheriff's deed, in pursuance of a sale for a delinquent tax, will prevail over a title acquired by a similar deed for the tax of a previous year, even if the sale for the oldest tax was made after the sale for the later tax.