California Supreme Court, 1873

McLaughlin v. Hart

California Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1873

46 Cal. 638

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Blood v. Munn (Cal. 1909)
Kerens National Bank v. Stockton (Tex. 1931)
Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McCleverty (Cal. 1911)
Gordon v. Deavitt (Vt. 1910)
In re Bailey (District Court, D. Utah 1910)
White v. Horton (Cal. 1908)
In re Barrett's Estate (District Court, D. Oregon 1905)
Henkel v. Bohnke (Tex. App. 1894)
Colorado Iron Works v. Riekenberg (Idaho 1894)
Miller v. McCarty (Minn. 1891)
McCreery v. Schaffer (Neb. 1889)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

It is clear that as against the McLaughlin mortgage Mrs. Hart had the right to insist that the outside lands included *640in that mortgage should he exhausted before resorting to the homestead tract. In this view these outside lands constituted, to the extent of their value, a security provided against the possible sacrifice of her homestead to pay McLaughlin’s debt. This security, for obvious reasons, could not be impaired to her injury without her consent. The debts are owing by her husband, and the liens of the junior mortgagees upon the outside lands were created by him alone and without her consent, and to hold that these latter mortgagees may, for their own benefit, compel a sale of the homestead to satisfy the McLaughlin mortgage, would be in .effect to create a lien in favor of the junior mortgagees upon the homestead of Mrs. Hart without her consent.

Decree affirmed; remittitur forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.