People v. Roach
People v. Roach
48 Cal. 382; 1874 Cal. LEXIS 159
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Simon (Cal. 2001)
- People v. Sering (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)
- People v. Megladdery (Cal. Ct. App. 1940)
- People v. Pollock (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
- State v. Siepert (Idaho 1923)
- People v. Meseros (Cal. Ct. App. 1910)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The record purports to set forth “ substantially all the evidence given at the trial.” There was no evidence whatever tending to show that the offense was committed in the county of Mendocino, as charged. This "omission is fatal. (People v. Parks, 44 Cal. 105; Peoples. York, 9 Cal. 421.) Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.