De Laurencel v. De Boom
De Laurencel v. De Boom
Opinion of the Court
The letter from the testator, Jean Corneille De Boom,, dated on the same day on which the will was executed, and directed to the defendant, Romain De Boom, the sole devisee under the will, explains the trust upon which the testator intended to devise the estate; and we are of opinion that when the defendant, during the life-time of the testator, accepted, in writing, the terms of the trust, and bound himself to execute it faithfully, this created a valid trust, which a Court of equity will enforce. The presumption is, that the testator would have revoked or modified the will, except for the fact that the defendant, by a solemn instrument, ac
Order refusing .to dissolve the injunction-affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MARIE DE LAURENCEL and ANGLIQUE DE LAURENCEL, by GUSTAVE DUSSOL, their Guardian v. ROMAIN CORNEILLE DE BOOM, ALBERT DE BOOM, URSULE VAN BRANTEGHEM, FANNY DE BOOM, LOUISE VICTORINE BOUSCATIER, LEON LEGAULT, MARIE LEGAULT, LEON DE LAURENCEL, and THE SPRING VALLEY WATER WORKS
- Cited By
- 12 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- When a Leoatee becomes a Tbustbe.—If the testator, after making a will in which he devises all his property absolutely, writes a letter to the legatee, stating the trusts upon which the testator intended to devise the estate, and explaining how the legatee was to execute the trusts, and the legatee, during the life-time of the testator, accepts in writing the terms of the trust, and promises to execute it faithfully, a trust is created as expressed in the letter, and a Court of equity will compel the legatee to execute it.