Keller v. Ruiz De Ocana
California Supreme Court
Keller v. Ruiz De Ocana, 48 Cal. 638 (Cal. 1874)
McKinstry
Keller v. Ruiz De Ocana
Opinion of the Court
The demurrer to the complaint should have been overruled. (Payne v. Treadwell, 16 Cal. 242.)
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MATTHEW KELLER v. FRANCISCO RUIZ DE OCANA
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Complaint in Ejectment.βIn a complaint to recover possession of land, it is sufficient to aver that the plaintiff owns the same, and that the defendant is in possession adversely to the plaintiff, and withholds the same.