Curtiss v. Sprague
Curtiss v. Sprague
49 Cal. 301
Opinion of the Court
The counter-claim was barred by the Statute of Limitations, and, under the provisions of the Practice Act, the plaintiff must be considered to have pleaded the statute by way of replication to the counter-claim.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.
Neither Mr. Justice Crockett nor Mr. Justice Rhodes expressed an opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.