La Societe Française D'Epargnes Et De Prevoyance Mutuelle v. McHenry
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. The demurrers to the complaint interposed by the defendants, were properly overruled.
2. The answers presented no available defense to the action, and were properly stricken out.
3. There is no personal judgment against McHenry for the deficiency, if any, after the application of the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises.
4. The ex parte direction to the Sheriff to proceed with the mortgage sale, notwithstanding the appeal, was proper.
The judgment and order affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Neither Mr. Justice Rhodes nor Mr. Justice Niles expressed an opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.