In re Estate of Wright
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sullivan v. Curry (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1930)
- Brought v. Howard (Ariz. 1926)
- In re Estate of Ayers (Cal. 1917)
- Rice v. Carey (Cal. 1915)
- Hebrew Home for Aged Disabled v. Friedman (Cal. 1915)
- Stewart v. Smith (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
- McCabe v. Healy (Cal. 1902)
- Bruning v. Golden (Ind. 1902)
- Jones v. Lamont (Cal. 1897)
- Merrick v. Kennedy (Neb. 1895)
- In re Hodgman's Estate (New York Supreme Court 1893)
- In re Dewar's Estate (Mont. 1891)
- Goldtree v. Thompson (Cal. 1890)
- In re Jessup (Cal. 1889)
- Roach v. Coffey (Cal. 1887)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The Court below ordered that a certain portion of the estate be distributed to the widow and heirs of the deceased; and, subsequently, denied the executor’s motion for a new trial. From these orders the executor alone appeals. The executor does not object to the order on the ground that the amount ordered to be distributed is too large, but only that it is not properly distributed—that the order allots to one party too large a portion. The executor is not interested in that question; and Bates v. Ryberg (40 Cal. 463), is clear authority that he cannot maintain an appeal on that ground.
Orders affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.