People v. Ah Dat
California Supreme Court
People v. Ah Dat, 49 Cal. 652 (Cal. 1875)
McKinstry
People v. Ah Dat
Opinion of the Court
The paper writing offered in evidence, was improperly admitted as the dying declaration of the deceased. The
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PEOPLE v. AH DAT
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Dzma Declabations.—Dying declarations are not admissible in evidence, unless the declarant believes himself in such extremity that every hope of this world is gone, and that his dissolution is actually impending.