Hibbing v. Hyde
California Supreme Court
Hibbing v. Hyde, 50 Cal. 206 (Cal. 1875)
1875 Cal. LEXIS 125
McKinstry
Hibbing v. Hyde
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the defendant maliciously, and without probable cause, charged the plaintiff, before a justice of the peace, with having committed the crime of malicious mischief. Plaintiff also alleges that he was tried and found guilty of the crime charged; and this averment he succeeded in proving at the trial of the present action.
In an action for malicious prosecution of a criminal charge, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution, alleged to have been malicious, has terminated by his acquittal. (Rhodes v. Silvers, 1 Harr. 127; 2 Greenl. Evidence, 252; 1 Hill on Torts, 416; Hilliard, Remedies for Torts, 385.)
Judgment and order affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- WILLIAM HIBBING v. MOSES H. HYDE
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Malicious Pbosecutioh.βIn an action for malicious prosecution of a criminal charge, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution alleged to have been malicious has terminated by his acquittal.