Hibbing v. Hyde

California Supreme Court
Hibbing v. Hyde, 50 Cal. 206 (Cal. 1875)
1875 Cal. LEXIS 125
McKinstry

Hibbing v. Hyde

Opinion of the Court

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the defendant maliciously, and without probable cause, charged the plaintiff, before a justice of the peace, with having committed the crime of malicious mischief. Plaintiff also alleges that he was tried and found guilty of the crime charged; and this averment he succeeded in proving at the trial of the present action.

In an action for malicious prosecution of a criminal charge, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution, alleged to have been malicious, has terminated by his acquittal. (Rhodes v. Silvers, 1 Harr. 127; 2 Greenl. Evidence, 252; 1 Hill on Torts, 416; Hilliard, Remedies for Torts, 385.)

Judgment and order affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
WILLIAM HIBBING v. MOSES H. HYDE
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Malicious Pbosecutioh.β€”In an action for malicious prosecution of a criminal charge, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution alleged to have been malicious has terminated by his acquittal.