Roberts v. Treadwell
Roberts v. Treadwell
50 Cal. 520
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ingalls v. Bell (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)
- Zimmerman v. Prior (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)
- A. Widemann Co. v. Digges (Cal. Ct. App. 1913)
- Knox v. Buckman Contracting Co. (Cal. 1903)
- Penrose v. Winter (Cal. 1901)
- Tomlinson v. Ayres (Cal. 1897)
- Hurley v. Ryan (Cal. 1897)
- London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co. v. Liebes (Cal. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The complaint did not allege that the defendant had not paid the indebtedness, for the recovery of which this action was brought. It merely averred “that the whole thereof is now due.” This defect in the complaint was pointed out by a special demurrer, which was overruled. The insufficiency of the complaint in the respect indicated was adverted to in Frisch v. Caler (21 Cal. 71).
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.