Hawkins v. Hawkins
California Supreme Court
Hawkins v. Hawkins, 50 Cal. 558 (Cal. 1875)
Hawkins v. Hawkins
Opinion of the Court
The demurrer was properly sustained. It does not appear from the complaint that any relation of especial trust or confidence existed between the parties to the contract, or that the means of knowledge as to the terms and, conditions of the writing were not equally open and accessible to both. The care and diligence of a prudent man in the transaction of his business would demand an examination of the instrument before signing, either by himself or by some one for him in whom he had a right to place confidence.
The fact that the plaintiff was illiterate, and could read manuscript only with difficulty, did not render this precaution less necessary.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- A. C. HAWKINS v. V. HAWKINS, DUANE BALLARD and ISAAC R. HALL
- Cited By
- 54 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Setting Aside Contbact fob Fbaud.—If a person enters into a contract with another, between whom and himself no relation of especial trust or confidence exists, and it is reduced to writing by such other person, and the means of a knowledge of the terms of the writing are equally open to both, and he signs it without reading, or having it read by some one for him, he cannot avoid a liability created by the writing, even if its terms differ from the contract as agreed on verbally. The fact that he is illiterate does not change the rule.