Goodwin v. Nickerson
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lederer v. Muir (Cal. Ct. App. 1947)
- Saline Valley Bank v. Peckham (Kan. 1921)
- Todd v. State Bank (Iowa 1917)
- Series AGI West Linn of Appian Group Investors DE, LLC v. Eves (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)
- Lopez v. Puzina (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)
- Cadigan v. American Trust Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1955)
- Cadigan v. American Trust Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1955)
- Shattuck v. Chase (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)
- Oceanview Memorial Park v. Caminetti (Cal. Ct. App. 1943)
- Bergman v. Ornbaun (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
- In re Downey (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1939)
- Symonds v. Sherman (Cal. 1933)
- Spotton v. Dyer (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
- Myrick v. Purcell (Minn. 1905)
- Jacoway v. Insurance Co. (Ark. 1887)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The twelve thousand dollar note sued on is clearly the note described and referred to in the contract between the parties, and the note is, therefore, to be read in connection with the contract, as though the note had been incorporated in the contract. In this view and upon any construction of the contract it was error in the court below to exclude the proof offered by the defendant that the plaintiff had broken one of the stipulations of the contract, in not having expended on the mine a sum greater than five hundred dollars.
Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed and cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.