Barker v. Hope

California Supreme Court
Barker v. Hope, 1 Cal. Unrep. 877 (Cal. 1875)
Crockett, McKinstry, Rhodes

Barker v. Hope

Opinion of the Court

McKINSTRY, J.

— We think the first instruction given by the court below is not obnoxious to the criticism to which *878it is subjected in appellant’s brief. The district court properly asserted judicial knowledge of the fact that a “fence pole” is a “heavy club”; and when the court said, “the defendant admits that he struck the plaintiff substantially as charged, ’ ’ it was a statement of an admission that he struck with a heavy club, and not of the alleged malice accompanying the blow.

Nor do we think the other points made by the appellant are well taken.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Crockett, J.; Rhodes, J.

Reference

Full Case Name
JAMES L. BARKER v. THOMAS HOPE
Status
Published