County of Monterey v. McKee
County of Monterey v. McKee
51 Cal. 255
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rose v. Pearman (Cal. Ct. App. 1958)
- Tyson v. Reinecke (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
- Ancient Order of Hibernians v. Sparrow (Mont. 1903)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It is not necessary to decide whether the county judge had authority to hear or determine the motion to discharge the attachment, since, assuming he had jurisdiction, he determined it wrongly.
The official bond of the defendant as county treasurer was an obligation for the direct payment of money. (San Francisco v. Brader, 50 Cal. 506; Hathaway v. Davis, 83 Cal. 161.)
Order appealed from reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.