Ex parte Rosenblat
Ex parte Rosenblat
Opinion of the Court
Under the Constitution of the United States and the act of Congress, a State is bound to surrender a fugitive for whom a proper requisition has been-issued by the Governor of the sister State. The act of the Legislature was passed as auxiliary to the proceedings under the Constitution and act of Congress, but is based solely on principles of comity; and the Legislature had power to affix as many conditions as to the mode in which the preliminary arrest and examination should be conducted as the Legislature deemed proper.
We are inclined to the belief that a person thus arrested, with a view to his being surrendered on requisition expected to arrive, is entitled to his discharge if his examination is not brought on before the magistrate within six days. The act of the Legislature which authorizes such preliminary arrest should be strictly complied with, but we do not think it necessary to decide that question in the present case.
We think, reference being had to the obligation imposed by the Constitution of the United States, that the same rule is applicable to a proceeding under a requisition from the Governor of another State as applies when the question is between a criminal proceeding initiated in this State and a civil action. In such case the interest of the private suitor who has caused a defendant to be arrested must yield to the paramount interest of the people of the State.
Ordered that H. H. Ellis, chief of police of the city and county of San Francisco, State of California, be, and he is hereby authorized to serve the warrant of arrest issued by the Governor of the State of California, upon the requisition of the Governor of the State of New York, for the surrender and delivery of Bosenblat, and to deliver said Bosenblat to Bichard O’Connor, agent of the State of New York ; and the sheriff of said city and county is hereby authorized and directed to surrender and deliver the body of said Samson Bosenblat into the custody of said H. H. Ellis, chief of police as aforesaid, for the purposes aforesaid.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ex Parte ROSENBLAT
- Cited By
- 11 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Abbest os Fugitive fbom Justice.—Although, under the Constitution of the United States and the Act of Congress, a State is only bound to surrender a fugitive from justice for whom a requisition has been issued by the Governor of a sister State, yet the Legislature, upon principles of comity, may provide for the arrest and detention of such fugitive before the requisition has arrived, and may accompany the act for the arrest by as many conditions (favorable to the alleged fugitive) as to his mode of arrest and examination as it may see fit, and such act must be strictly complied with. Idem.—Beading section 1550, in connection with 861 of the Penal Code, it would seem that when a person is arrested, charged with the commission of a crime in another State, before a demand for his surrender has been made by the Governor of the other State, he is entitled to his discharge if, after his examination has commenced, it is postponed against his consent for a longer period than that mentioned in section 861. Abbest or a Person on both Cbiminal and Civil Pbooess.—An officer, armed with process for the arrest of a person in a civil suit, cannot take the defendant from the hands of another officer who holds him on a warrant issued in a criminal Case ; nor can he hold such person as against one armed with a criminal warrant; and the same rule applies to a proceeding under a requisition from the Governor of another State asking for his return as a fugitive from justice.