McCullough v. Board of Education

California Supreme Court
McCullough v. Board of Education, 51 Cal. 418 (Cal. 1876)
1876 Cal. LEXIS 67

McCullough v. Board of Education

Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The Board of Education had no authority to appropriate Hamilton Square, or any portion thereof, as a site for the proposed high school. The purposes for which the public squares may be used are those defined by positive law, and the erection of school-houses thereon is not one of these purposes. The resolution of the Board of Supervisors assuming to authorize the Board of Education to appropriate *420a portion of this square for that purpose, though passed in due form, was inoperative, because the Board had no authority to devote a public square to that purpose.

The contract of the Board of Education, upon which the suit is founded, was consequently %Htra vires in the extreme sense, and the plaintiff could derive no rights thereunder, since he was bound to take notice that the Board of Education could not, under any circumstances, acquire a right to occupy a public square for school purposes,

Order granting a new trial affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
SAMUEL McCULLOUGH v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Cited By
17 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Public Square in San Francisco.—The Board of Education of the City and County of San Francisco has no authority to appropriate a public square in said city and county, or any portion thereof, as a site for tho erection of a school-house; nor has the Board of Supervisors any authority to authorize such appropriation. Contract ultra vires.—-If the Board of Education of the City and County of San Francisco contracts with a builder to erect a school-house on a public square, the contract is ultra vires, and the builder can acquire no rights thereunder. Illegal Contract.—A contract made in violation of law is void, and no damages can be recovered for its non-fulfillment.