Barber v. Burrows
California Supreme Court
Barber v. Burrows, 51 Cal. 473 (Cal. 1876)
1876 Cal. LEXIS 82
Barber v. Burrows
Opinion of the Court
The instrument -of September 2, 1872, was never completely executed. It is evident upon an inspection of the writing itself, that it was intended to be signed by all the parties to the contract upon which it was endorsed. These parties were the two principals in the contract and the two sureties upon the bond attached to and forming a part of the contract. It was signed by but three of these persons.
As the contract for the extension of time was not complete, it was not obligatory.
Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- M. BARBER v. JONATHAN BURROWS, JOSEPH BAUQUIER and WILLIAM GWYNN
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Execution of Contbact.—If two parties execute a bond as sureties for a third, conditioned that he will fulfill a contract he has made with a fourth, to erect a building within a given time, and a written agreement is afterwards drawn up to be executed by the four, extending the time to fulfill the contract, and such agreement is signed by three only, it is not binding on either.