Misch v. Mayhew

California Supreme Court
Misch v. Mayhew, 51 Cal. 514 (Cal. 1876)

Misch v. Mayhew

Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The judgment of the court below is erroneous. The language of section 1116 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which fixes the time when the list of alleged illegal voters shall be served, is equivalent to a requirement that the opposite party shall have three days’ notice of the illegal votes which the party serving the list expects to prove at the trial. The case is, therefore, covered by section 12 of the same code, and a list served on the seventh of December could properly be relied upon and proven at the trial on the tenth of December.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded, and the County Court is directed to retry the issues made by the statement of the contestant and the answer of defendant thereto.

Reference

Full Case Name
MAYER MISCH v. H. A. MAYHEW
Cited By
17 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Computation ot Time in skeying Notices.—In a contest concerning an election to an office, the three clays’ notice which a party who relies on illegal votes given for his adversary must give of the illegal votes he expects to prove are to be computed by including the first day and excluding the last.