Curry v. White

California Supreme Court
Curry v. White, 51 Cal. 530 (Cal. 1876)

Curry v. White

Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The defendants, McMullen and Roundtree, are not responsible upon the note in the case, which was made after the *532dissolution of the partnership. Nor are they responsible upon the original account, because the same was barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Judgment and order reversed as to -the-defendants, McMullen and Roundtree.

Reference

Full Case Name
A. J. CURRY v. OSCAR WHITE, GEO. O. McMULLEN and JAMES D. ROUNDTREE
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Authority oh Partner.—One member of a partnership cannot bind Ms co-partner by a promissory note for a partnership demand, made after the dissolution of the partnership.