Williston v. Perkins
Cases that cite this one
32 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Seattle Automobile Co. v. Stimson (Wash. 1912)
- Sherman v. Ingelman (Cal. Ct. App. 1943)
- Public Market Co. v. City of Portland (Or. 1942)
- Weaver v. Grunbaum (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
- Glazer v. Klughaupt (N.J. 1936)
- Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation District (Cal. 1931)
- Richards v. Tavares (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
- Wallace v. Carlin (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)
- Looney v. Scott (Cal. Ct. App. 1925)
- Valley Fruit Co. v. Swash (Wash. 1925)
- Goulis v. Angel (Mass. 1925)
- Banque Russo-Asiatique v. Dolch (9th Cir. 1925)
- Pegg v. Olson (Wyo. 1924)
- Daily v. Quinn (Ala. 1922)
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. Pendar (Tex. App. 1922)
- Allen v. Estate of Allen (Ill. App. Ct. 1920)
- Rosenheim v. Howze (Cal. 1918)
- Greenstreet v. Cheatum (Kan. 1916)
- Van Buskirk v. Kuhns (Cal. 1913)
- Lynch v. Keystone Consol. Mining Co. (Cal. 1912)
- Simon v. Etgen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1912)
- Rosenberg v. F. J. Lewis Manufacturing Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 1912)
- Rumsey v. Livers (Md. 1910)
- Case v. Beyer (Wis. 1910)
- Thisler v. Stephenson (Wash. 1909)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendants were entitled to only reasonable time in which to finish and sell the schooner, and that time having elapsed, the plaintiff could maintain this action. (19 Wall. 560.)
But the appellants claim in their points on file that there was no evidence whatever going to sustain the third finding, to the effect that by the agreement of the parties the demand
The case was submitted here without oral argument. The respondent in his printed points has not adverted to this position of the appellants. If there be in the voluminous record on file any evidence going to support the finding in the respect referred to, the respondent should have pointed it out. It is not our business to institute a search to find it.
Cause remanded, with directions to modify the judgment by striking out the gold coin clause therein,
Bemittitur forthwith.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.