Mason v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
Mason v. Johnson, 51 Cal. 612 (Cal. 1877)
Mason v. Johnson
Opinion of the Court
1. The protest served upon the defendant wras sufficient, for the defendant was bound to take notice of the matter, which rendered the tax illegal.
2. There was no authority in the tax collector of the city of Oakland to collect the taxes levied in the town of Brooklyn. He had not been elected tax collector by the qualified electors of Brooklyn, as required by the constitution. (Art. II, sec. 13.) The case of the People v. Hastings (29 Cal. 449) upon this point is decisive of this case.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to render judgment for the plaintiff upon the agreed statement of facts.
Mr. Justice McKinstry expressed no opinion.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- W. C. MASON v. PERRY JOHNSON
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Protest against Payment or Tax.—A tax collector is bound to know the limits of the district for which he was elected, and if he enforces the payment of a tax on property outside of • said limits, a general protest against the payment of the same is sufficient to 'enable the party paying to recover it back. Collection or Tax.—A tax collector elected for a city cannot collect the taxes of an adjoining town, even if it has, after his election, and after the levy of the tax, been annexed to the city.