Unger v. Roper
California Supreme Court
Unger v. Roper, 53 Cal. 39 (Cal. 1878)
Unger v. Roper
Opinion of the Court
There certainly was evidence tending to show that defendant was in the adverse possession continuously of the premises in controversy, for more than five years from May, 1862. The judgment-roll in the forcible-entry case was admissible, as tending to show that such adverse possession continued at least until July, 1867.
Appeal from judgment dismissed, and order denying new trial affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- ADOLPH UNGER v. EDWARD ROPER
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Statute of Limitations — Judgment-Rom, as Evidence.—In an action of ejectment, where the defendant pleads the Statute of Limitations, a judgment-roll, in a forcible-entry case, is admissible as evidence of the defendant’s adverse possession.