Holland v. Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Co.
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Doe v. Waterloo Min. Co. (9th Cir. 1895)
- Sarnow v. Wood (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
- Green v. Gavin (Cal. Ct. App. 1909)
- Worthen v. Sidway (Ark. 1904)
- Runnels v. State (Tex. Crim. App. 1903)
- Donahue v. Meister (Cal. 1891)
- Lebanon Mining Co. v. Consolidated Republican Mining Co. (Colo. 1882)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was in possession of the mining ground prior to the dates when the plaintiffs attempted to locate it, under the provisions of the Act of Congress of May 10, 1872.
Before the commencement of this action the location of plaintiffs was not distinctly marlced on the ground so that its boundaries could be readily traced, as required by the Act. (Rev. Stats. U. S. sec. 2324.)
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.