Goodhue v. Rice
California Supreme Court
Goodhue v. Rice, 53 Cal. 302 (Cal. 1878)
Goodhue v. Rice
Opinion of the Court
The point urged by appellant could only have been properly presented to this Court by a bill of exceptions. The adjudication of defendant’s bankruptcy was not an issuable fact to be submitted to the jury, or to be determined by the findings—a jury being waived.
The application of a defendant for a stay of further proceedings in the action, on the ground that he has been adjudged a bankrupt, is a motion, and the evidence given by him in the District Court of the State in support of this motion can be considered here only when_ contained in a bill of exceptions duly settled and certified by the Judge of the Court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- O. P. GOODHUE v. D. A. RICE
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Bankruptcy—Bill of Exceptions. — The adjudication of the bankruptcy of a party is not an issuable fact to be determined by the findings—a jury being waived—and where such a plea has been interposed, the party presenting it to the Supreme Court on appeal must embody it in a bill of exceptions. Same.—An application to stay proceedings on the ground that the applicant has been adjudged a bankrupt is a motion, and evidence given by him in support of the motion cannot be considered on appeal unless contained in a bill of exceptions.