Buell v. Dodge
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Johnson v. Clark (Mont. 1957)
- Gutierrez v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)
- Donohoe v. Wooster (Cal. 1912)
- Apartments, Inc. v. Trott (Cal. Ct. App. 1959)
- Wiley v. Long (Cal. Ct. App. 1957)
- Sloan v. Court Hotel (Cal. Ct. App. 1945)
- Warren v. Ritter (Cal. Ct. App. 1943)
- Balbás Peña v. Luce & Co., S. en C. (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1935)
- Balbás Peña v. Luce & Co., S. en C. (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1935)
- Story v. Christin (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
- Prendergast v. Mitchell-Silliman Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1924)
- McClung v. Watt (Cal. 1922)
- Garrett v. Jensen (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
- German Savings Bank v. Citizens National Bank (Iowa 1897)
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co. (Cal. 1895)
- Wallace v. Owsley (Mont. 1891)
- Fong v. Sternes (Cal. 1889)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The demand that the trial be had in San Francisco county was made by defendants when they demurred to the original complaint; by which complaint it appeared that the defendant Dodge (a resident of San Francisco) was the only defendant against whom the facts alleged would justify a judgment.
Dodge’s right to a change of the place of trial is to be determined by the then conditions of the case, and could not be taken away by statements in an amended complaint subsequently filed.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.