Whitney v. Purrington
California Supreme Court
Whitney v. Purrington, 59 Cal. 36 (Cal. 1881)
Whitney v. Purrington
Opinion of the Court
The complaint charges that the parties entered into a partnership to sell hay, grain, etc. That the business was con-tinned until April, 1879, when an accounting of the whole business was had and a settlement made, by which there “became due” (was found to be due) from defendant to plaintiff a certain sum. The evidence tended to prove a purchase of the plaintiff’s interest in the goods and assets of the firm by defendant. The Court below nonsuited plaintiff, in which we can not say there was error. •
Judgment and order affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- A. W. WHITNEY v. JOSEPH PURRINGTON
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published