People v. Williams
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Dietz (Mont. 1959)
- People v. Gann (Cal. Ct. App. 1968)
- People v. Battilana (Cal. Ct. App. 1942)
- People v. Paz (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)
- People v. Martinez (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)
- People v. Santiago Vázquez (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1967)
- Pueblo v. Santiago Vázquez (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1967)
- People v. Daniel (Cal. Ct. App. 1959)
- People v. Daniel (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California 1959)
- People v. Smith (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)
- State v. Morrison (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
- People v. Boljat (Cal. Ct. App. 1940)
- Pueblo v. Ceferino (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1926)
- In re Rankin (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
- People v. Colburn (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1914)
- Glover v. State (Ind. 1913)
- State v. Johnson (Utah 1913)
- State v. Harsted (Wash. 1911)
- People v. Erwin (Cal. Ct. App. 1906)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We have examined the information in this case, and consider it good. The acts constituting the offense are stated in ordinary and concise language, and in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended. (Penal Code, § 950.) Every person of ordinary intelligence understands what the crime against nature with a human being is.
We find no error in the instruction to which our attention is called, and the judgment and order are affirmed.
Sharpstein, J., and Morrison, C. J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.