Myers v. Hamilton
California Supreme Court
Myers v. Hamilton, 60 Cal. 289 (Cal. 1882)
1882 Cal. LEXIS 446
Myers v. Hamilton
Opinion of the Court
The petitioner applies for a writ of review to correct alleged errors of the respondents in declaring a vacancy in the office of Supervisor, and in appointing a person to fill the vacancy.
Even if the appointing power rested with the respondents, the exercise of that power was not the exercise of a judicial function within the meaning of Section 1068, C. C. P. (People v. Bush, 40 Cal. 344.)
The motion to quash the proceedings is granted.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- F. F. MYERS v. N. HAMILTON, Judges of the Superior Court etc
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Certiorari—Vacancy in Office of Supervisors—Appointment by Superior Judge.—Certiorari to review an order of the defendants (under Pol. C. § 4026) appointing a person to fill a vacancy in the office of Supervisor. Held: The order was not an exercise of a judicial function within the meaning of § 1068 C. C. P.