People v. Giesea

California Supreme Court
People v. Giesea, 61 Cal. 53 (Cal. 1882)
1882 Cal. LEXIS 535

People v. Giesea

Opinion of the Court

The Court :

Information for bigamy. The Court sustained the demur*54rer to the information on the ground that it does not state at what place the defendant was first married. But in this respect the District Attorney appears to have followed the precedents given by Archbold and Wharton, and we do not think that the code requires anything more.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the Court below to overrule the demurrer, with leave to the defendant to plead to the information.

Reference

Full Case Name
THE PEOPLE v. FREDRICK E. GIESEA
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Information—Bigamy—Place of Marriage.—It is not necessary that an information for bigamy should state at what place the defendant was first married.