Blackman v. Marsicano
Blackman v. Marsicano
61 Cal. 638; 1882 Cal. LEXIS 681
Blackman v. Marsicano
Opinion of the Court
The claim of lien in this case, in stating the terms, time given, and conditions of the contract, used the words, “ cash upon demand, in gold coin of the United States.” This was a substantial compliance with the requirement of the statute. The case of Hooper v. Flood (54 Cal. 221) presented a statement quite different in effect from that here presented.
Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.