Condee v. Barton
California Supreme Court
Condee v. Barton, 62 Cal. 1 (Cal. 1882)
1882 Cal. LEXIS 684
Condee v. Barton
Opinion of the Court
We know of no principle that would estop the plaintiffs from claiming their commission, because the “ memorandum of agreement” describes the defendant as owner of the property to be sold.
We can see no objection to the practice of changing the conclusions of law, based upon the finding of facts at any time before judgment is entered. The declaration of the general conclusion of law from the facts found, is the rendition of the judgment in so far, as that, when entered, the
Judgment and order affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- CHARLES H. CONDEE v. HIRAM M. BARTON
- Cited By
- 16 cases
- Status
- Published