Santa Cruz Railroad v. Board of Supervisors
Santa Cruz Railroad v. Board of Supervisors
62 Cal. 239; 1882 Cal. LEXIS 728
Opinion of the Court
We are satisfied, from the record, that the conditions precedent upon which the respondent was entitled to have the bonds issued to it, had all been performed by it, before the commencement of this proceeding, and therefore that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed. (Nevada Bank v. Steinmetz, 10 P. C. L. J. 459.)
Judgment affirmed.
McKee, Myrick, and Thornton, JJ., dissented.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.