Reynolds v. Superior Court
Cases that cite this one
31 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- MAURO B. v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)
- Scott v. Municipal Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1974)
- Simmons v. Superior Court (Cal. 1959)
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)
- Popelka, Allard, McCowan & Jones v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)
- Bryant v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1936)
- Pullman Co. v. State Board of Equalization (Idaho 1918)
- Cooper v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty. (Cal. Ct. App. 1915)
- Hall v. Justice's Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
- State ex rel. Alexander v. Superior Court (Wash. 1906)
- Chung Kao v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)
- People v. Municipal Court (Mercer) (Cal. Ct. App. 1979)
- Frantz v. State (Okla. Crim. App. 1940)
- Patterson v. . R. R. (N.C. 1938)
- Patterson v. Southern Railway Co. (N.C. 1938)
- Ziemer v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (District Court, D. Nevada 1938)
- Hoxsey v. Baker (Iowa 1933)
- Lauchere v. Lambert (Cal. 1930)
- Haynes v. Los Angeles Railroad Corp. (Cal. Ct. App. 1927)
- Warren People's Market Co. v. Corbett & Sons (Ohio 1926)
- Lloyd v. Johnson (D.C. Cir. 1916)
- Reichardt v. Hill (6th Cir. 1916)
- Wood v. Krepps (Cal. 1914)
- Harrison v. Kersey (Fla. 1914)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
By means of certiorari the petitioner seeks to call in question the validity of a judgment and an order made and entered considerably more than one year before the presentation of his' petition. In Keys v. Marin County, 42 Cal. 256, it was held that unless circumstances of an extraordinary character be shown to have intervened, the remedy through a writ of certiorari should be held to be barred by the lapse of the same length of time that bars an appeal from a final judgment.
In the present case no excuse is shown for the delay in the application.
Writ denied and proceedings dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.