Estate of Burton
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tarman v. Pierce (Okla. 1934)
- In re Estate of Niccolls (Cal. 1912)
- Estate of Edith E. Dalton v. Dalton (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)
- Sonnicksen v. Sonnicksen (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)
- Dickey v. Gibson (Cal. 1898)
- In re the Estate of Heldt (Cal. 1893)
- In re Estate of Groome (Cal. 1892)
- In re Estate of Backus (Cal. 1892)
- Fisher (Cal. 1888)
- McDonald v. Burton (Cal. 1886)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appeal in this case is from an order setting apart a homestead, and from an order refusing a new trial. The order setting apart the homestead was made and entered June 27, 1883; the notice of appeal was served September 18, 1883, more than sixty days after the order was made. (§ 1715, Code Civ. Proc.; Estate of Harland, 64 Cal. 379.) The appeal from this order is therefore dismissed.
As to the appeal from the order denying motion for new trial, it would, doubtless, be competent for a court sitting in probate to examine into the title to a given parcel of the real estate mentioned in the 'inventory as a basis for the exercise of its discretion in selecting one parcel or the other as a homestead; but,
Sharpstein, J., and Thornton, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.