California Supreme Court, 1884

Ex parte Whitty

Ex parte Whitty
California Supreme Court · Decided April 29, 1884
65 Cal. 168; 3 P. 660; 1884 Cal. LEXIS 481

Ex parte Whitty

Opinion of the Court

The Court.

—If giving notice of appeal and filing a bond would have stayed execution of sentence pending the appeal, it is sufficiently clear that on the dismissal of the appeal the petitioner herein might have been recommitted to prison. This is not disputed. But it is claimed that the appeal did not stay execution because there was no “certificate of probable cause,” such as the Code requires in order to have the appeal operate as a stay. The appeal, however, was duly taken, and the justice, sheriff, and petitioner treated it as a stay of execution during its pend-ency. We think, under such circumstances, the same effect *169should be given to the dismissal of the appeal as would be given to it if there had been a certificate of probable cause.

Application denied and petitioner remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.