People v. Hicks
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Tufunga (Cal. 1999)
- People v. Wade (Cal. Ct. App. 1945)
- People v. Dozier (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
- McClure v. Lence (Ill. App. Ct. 1953)
- People v. Pacheco-Rodríguez (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1927)
- Pueblo v. Pacheco Rodríguez (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1927)
- People v. Cleary (Cal. Ct. App. 1905)
- People v. Ammerman (Cal. 1897)
- People v. Hanselman (Cal. 1888)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
-The only point made by the appellant in this case is, that “ the information fails to allege that the property taken was the property of some person other than the defendant.” But the information contains this averment, viz: “ That the property taken was the personal property in the possession of Frederick Schwartz, * * * and that the same was taken from the person and against the will of him, the said Schwartz.” We think this is a sufficient averment that the property belonged to Schwartz,, and that it was taken from him by the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Ross, J., and McKinstry, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.