Boyle v. Hitchcock

California Supreme Court
Boyle v. Hitchcock, 66 Cal. 129 (Cal. 1884)
4 P. 1143; 1884 Cal. LEXIS 710

Boyle v. Hitchcock

Opinion of the Court

The Court

-We are of opinion that the objection to the assessment, in this case, that it included an amount, as incidental expenses, for engineering and printing, was waived by a failure to appeal to the board of supervisors. (§ 12 of the act of 1872; Stats. 1871-2, p. 815.)

We are also of the opinion that the resolution of intention sufficiently described the work which the board of supervisors desired to have done.

Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
JOHN BOYLE v. C. M. HITCHCOCK
Cited By
10 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Stbeet Assessment—Appeal to Supervisors—Waiver of Objection.—An objection to a street assessment in San Francisco, that it included an amount, as incidental expenses, for engineering and printing, is waived by a failure to appeal to the board of supervisors.