Boyle v. Hitchcock
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ahlman v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
- L. A. Paving Co. v. Los Angeles Foundry Co. (Cal. 1919)
- Bates v. Hadamson (Cal. Ct. App. 1905)
- Fanning v. Leviston (Cal. 1892)
- Perine v. Forbush (Cal. 1893)
- McBean v. Redick (Cal. 1892)
- Frick v. Morford (Cal. 1891)
- McVerry v. Boyd (Cal. 1891)
- Jennings v. Le Breton (Cal. 1889)
- Blair v. Luning (Cal. 1888)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
-We are of opinion that the objection to the assessment, in this case, that it included an amount, as incidental expenses, for engineering and printing, was waived by a failure to appeal to the board of supervisors. (§ 12 of the act of 1872; Stats. 1871-2, p. 815.)
We are also of the opinion that the resolution of intention sufficiently described the work which the board of supervisors desired to have done.
Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.