California Supreme Court, 1885

Lutz v. Christy

California Supreme Court · Decided September 24, 1885 · Foote

67 Cal. 457; 8 P. 39; 1885 Cal. LEXIS 670

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

Norman v. Transamerica Title Insurance (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971)
Estate of Harrison (Cal. Ct. App. 1951)
Spafford v. Citizens' Trust & Savings Bank (Cal. 1917)
In re Estate of Allen (Cal. 1917)
In re Estate of McCarty (Cal. 1915)
In re Kelly's Estate (Mont. 1904)
Tuohy's Estate (Mont. 1899)
Estate of O'Dea (Cal. 1940)
In re Seymour (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)
Parent v. Lloyd (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)
Estate of Cahill (Cal. 1904)
Estate of Murphy (Cal. 1900)
In re Estate of Murphy (Cal. 1900)
In re Estate of Murphy (Cal. 1900)
In re the Estate of Wittmeier (Cal. 1897)
In re Bauquier (Cal. 1891)
In re the Estate of Wiard (Cal. 1890)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

The only matter disclosed by the. record here, which this court should consider, is the appeal from an order of the court below, refusing to set aside and vacate a former order of distribution and settlement of the final account of an executor.

In our opinion, such an order is not included in those enumerated in subdivision 3 of section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the appeal should be dismissed. (Blum v. Brownstone Bros. 50 Cal. 293; Estate of Callahan, 60 Cal. 232; Estate of Dean, 62 Cal. 613.)

Searls, C., and Belcher, C. C., concurred.

The Court. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the appeal is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.