O'Brien v. County of Colusa
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Christofferson v. Chouteau County (Mont. 1937)
- (PC) Snowden v. Scott (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2025)
- Aldana v. Walmart Inc. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2024)
- Disability Rights Washington v. Meneses (District Court, W.D. Washington 2024)
- Mirabelli v. Olson (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2024)
- Diaz v. Capital One, N.A. (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2021)
- Scott v. Carr (District Court, W.D. Washington 2021)
- (PC) Harris v. German (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2019)
- Rodriguez v. Akima Infrastructure Services, LLC (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2019)
- Rooney v. Snow (Cal. 1900)
- Grimley v. County of Santa Clara (Cal. 1886)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an action against Colusa County, to recover moneys alleged to have been “illegally and erroneously” collected for licenses, paid by divers persons who before suit assigned their claims to the plaintiff.
The several sums of money sued for, according to the allegations of the complaint, were voluntarily paid, and not for or on account of any property taxes assessed.
Section 3804 of the Political Code, which the plaintiff relied on to support his contention, does not apply to an action of this kind.
The demurrer to the complaint was properly sustained and the judgment should be affirmed.
Searls, C., and Belcher, C. C., concurred.
The Court. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.