California Supreme Court, 1885

Doggett v. Bellows

Doggett v. Bellows
California Supreme Court · Decided March 24, 1885
2 Cal. Unrep. 454; 6 P. 421

Doggett v. Bellows

Opinion of the Court

By the COURT.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. There is no averment in the complaint that any sum was due from the Mendocino Flume & Mining Company, the owner, to Bellows the contractor; therefore the demurrer of the company to the complaint should have been sustained: Latson v. Nelson, 11 Pac. C. L. J. 589; Whittier v. Hollister, 64 Cal. 283, 30 Pac. 846.

The judgment, so far as it concerns the Mendocino Flume & Mining Company, is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to sustain the demurrer above referred to.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.