California Supreme Court, 1885

Shuffleton v. Hill

California Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1885

2 Cal. Unrep. 473; 7 P. 7

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Virden v. Neese (Cal. Ct. App. 1944)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

By the COURT.

We are of opinion that, under the contract and lease, Greenlaw, in the first instance, and Hill, as *474his successor, owned the logs until delivery in the boom at the mill. Such being the case, plaintiff was entitled to an enforcement of his lien, irrespective of advances made by Vance to Hill.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.