Ah Goon v. Tarpey
California Supreme Court
Ah Goon v. Tarpey, 2 Cal. Unrep. 483 (Cal. 1885)
7 P. 188
Ah Goon v. Tarpey
Opinion of the Court
1. The difference in the names Ah Yak and Ah Jack; also as to whether the men were employed to be paid one dollar, or a dollar and a quarter, or a dollar and a half; and the statement in the assignment that the contract was with the Melrose Smelting & Refining Works—if variances, were immaterial, and misled no one: Code Civ. Proc., sec. 469.
2. The court did not err in striking out that portion of the answer relating to garnishment; it contained no defense to the action stated in the complaint.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- AH GOON v. TARPEY and Others
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal—Immaterial Variance.—Reversal is not Warranted by-variances between allegations and- proof which are immaterial, if no one is misled thereby.