Adair v. Crane
California Supreme Court
Adair v. Crane, 2 Cal. Unrep. 559 (Cal. 1885)
8 P. 512
Adair v. Crane
Opinion of the Court
1. There is evidence to sustain the finding as to the agreement of the parties that the wire fence should be the division line. It was competent for the parties to make such an agreement.
2. It is not manifest that any injury occurred from the refusal to strike out the testimony of the witness Criss.
We see no error in the transcript. Judgment and order affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- ADAIR v. CRANE and Others
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Boundaries.—Adjoining Proprietors may Orally Agree That the Division line between their lands shall be a certain fence. Appeal.—The Admission of Immaterial Evidence, if It Work No' Injury to the party complaining thereof, is error without injury, and not ground for a reversal.