California Supreme Court, 1886

Johnson v. Klein

California Supreme Court · Decided July 21, 1886 · Ross

70 Cal. 186; 11 P. 606; 1886 Cal. LEXIS 755

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

Lámar v. Lámar (Cal. 1947)
LaMar v. LaMar (Cal. 1947)
Kendrick v. Gould (Cal. Ct. App. 1921)
Turner v. Cyrus (Or. 1919)
McKelvey v. Wagy (Cal. 1910)
Chatfield v. Continental Building & Loan Ass'n (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
Wolfskill v. Douglas (Cal. 1900)
Pankey v. Ortiz (N.M. 1921)
Continental National Bank v. Stoltz (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)
Adams v. Barber (Cal. Ct. App. 1913)
Homeseekers Loan Association v. Gleeson (Cal. 1901)
Gale v. Bradbury (Cal. 1897)
Union Mill & Mining Co. v. Warren (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada 1897)
Boyd v. Boyd (Cal. 1893)
Williams v. Hall (Cal. 1889)
Gwinn v. Ton (Cal. 1888)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Ross, J.

It has been so often held here that a finding that all the averments of the complaint are true is a sufficient finding of facts that an appeal grounded on its *187alleged insufficiency must be held to have been taken for delay. The answer contained nothing but denials and an admission of matters alleged in' the complaint, so that the finding that all of the allegations of the complaint are true necessarily covers all of the issues made by the pleadings.

Judgment affirmed, with fifty dollars• damages.

McKinstry, J., and Myrick, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.